Alaska Federal Judge Resigns Amid Misconduct Allegations

A federal judge in Alaska, Joshua Kindred, has resigned following a judicial panel’s findings of misconduct. The investigation revealed that Kindred engaged in an inappropriate sexual relationship with a law clerk and created a hostile work environment. The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council’s 30-page order detailed instances of sexual harassment, vulgar remarks, and attempts to mislead investigators. Kindred’s resignation does not end the investigation, as the case has been referred to the Judicial Conference for potential impeachment proceedings.

Misconduct and Hostile Work Environment

Joshua Kindred, appointed by former President Donald Trump, was found to have created a hostile work environment for his law clerks. The investigation uncovered that Kindred frequently used inappropriate language and discussed his sex life with his clerks. He also made disparaging remarks about colleagues and public figures. These actions contributed to a toxic workplace atmosphere, making it difficult for his staff to perform their duties effectively.

The judicial panel’s findings were based on detailed testimonies and evidence. One law clerk reported that Kindred had an unusually close relationship with her, which included inappropriate physical contact and sexual advances. The panel concluded that Kindred’s behavior was not only unprofessional but also violated ethical standards expected of a federal judge.

federal judge misconduct allegations in alaska

Despite his resignation, the investigation into Kindred’s conduct continues. The Judicial Conference will consider recommending his impeachment, which could prevent him from holding any future high office. This case highlights the importance of maintaining integrity and professionalism within the judiciary.

Inappropriate Relationship and Deception

The investigation revealed that Kindred had an inappropriate sexual relationship with one of his law clerks. This relationship included unwanted sexual advances and physical contact. The law clerk reported that Kindred invited her to his apartment, where he performed sexual acts without her consent. These actions were not only unethical but also constituted sexual harassment.

Kindred’s attempts to deceive the investigative committee further compounded his misconduct. He initially denied having any sexual encounters with the law clerk, but evidence and testimonies contradicted his statements. The judicial panel found that Kindred’s lies and attempts to mislead investigators were serious breaches of trust and integrity.

The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council’s order emphasized the need for accountability and transparency within the judiciary. Judges are expected to uphold the highest standards of conduct, and any deviation from these standards undermines public trust in the judicial system. Kindred’s case serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical behavior and the consequences of misconduct.

Implications and Future Actions

Kindred’s resignation and the ongoing investigation have significant implications for the judiciary. The Judicial Conference’s potential recommendation for impeachment could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. Impeachment would require approval from Congress, a rare occurrence in U.S. history, but it would send a strong message about the judiciary’s commitment to accountability.

The case has also prompted discussions about the need for better oversight and mechanisms to address judicial misconduct. Ensuring that judges adhere to ethical standards is crucial for maintaining public confidence in the legal system. The judiciary must continue to self-govern and hold its members accountable to the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska has expressed support for Kindred’s resignation, stating that judges must be held to the highest standards. She emphasized the importance of swiftly advancing a replacement nominee to ensure the continued functioning of the judiciary. The case underscores the need for vigilance and proactive measures to prevent and address misconduct within the judicial system.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *