A Republican senator has moved to solidify St. Johns County as the future home of Florida’s Black History Museum, a decision that follows months of debate and political maneuvering. While some see this as a long-overdue step in recognizing Black history in Florida, others remain skeptical about the location and lack of funding commitments.
The Bill Moves Forward, but Questions Remain
Sen. Tom Leek, a North Florida Republican, filed SB 466 on Monday, formally designating St. Johns County as the site for the Florida Museum of Black History. This move aligns with the recommendation from a state-appointed task force, which issued its final report to Gov. Ron DeSantis and legislative leaders over six months ago.
“As we recognize February as Black History Month, I am proud to file Senate Bill 466 as we move forward as the preferred location for the Florida Museum of Black History,” Leek stated in a press release. He emphasized the historical significance of the selected site—the former grounds of Florida Memorial University.
The university, which relocated to Miami in the 1960s, has agreed to lease 17 acres of land for the museum’s construction. However, the legislation does not include any state funding, leaving open questions about how the museum will be financed and developed.
A Divisive Decision Among Lawmakers
The choice of St. Johns County has sparked disagreement within the task force and beyond. The panel, which convened for 10 meetings, was sharply divided over whether St. Johns or Eatonville in Orange County would be a better location. Some legislators openly accused each other of favoring sites that would benefit their constituencies rather than prioritizing historical relevance and accessibility.
Orange County Democratic Rep. Bruce Antone, who initially pushed for the task force’s creation but was not included in it, criticized the decision. He argued that St. Johns County is too isolated and underdeveloped to properly serve as a hub for Black history education and tourism.
“The task force spent more time arguing over the site than focusing on what the museum would actually offer,” Antone told the Florida Phoenix in June. He believes the lack of a clear business model and educational plan could undermine the project before it even breaks ground.
Historical Significance and Future Challenges
St. Johns County has deep historical ties to Black history in Florida. In 1738, when Spain still ruled the region, Fort Mose became the first legally sanctioned free Black settlement in what is now the United States. Supporters of the museum argue that this heritage makes the county a fitting location.
Despite the historical significance, challenges remain. Key issues include:
- Funding: The bill does not allocate state funds, raising concerns about how construction and operational costs will be covered.
- Accessibility: Critics argue that St. Johns County lacks the infrastructure and visibility of other potential sites, such as Eatonville, which has a rich Black history and is closer to major metropolitan areas.
- Governance: The bill establishes a 13-member board of directors, with appointments divided among the governor, Senate president, and House speaker. This political structure could influence the museum’s direction and priorities.
What Happens Next?
The legislation now moves through the Republican-controlled Legislature, where it is expected to pass. However, without a financial plan in place, the museum’s future remains uncertain. Lawmakers will need to address funding sources, a development timeline, and the museum’s long-term sustainability.
Supporters remain optimistic, seeing this as a crucial first step in honoring Black history in Florida. Critics, however, warn that without concrete commitments, this could be another symbolic gesture that fails to materialize into a meaningful institution.
Comments