Maryland Faces Mounting Infrastructure Costs and Declining Revenues
Maryland’s transportation infrastructure is facing an uphill battle, with dwindling revenues and rising costs putting a strain on the state’s ability to maintain and upgrade its roadways. Since 2020, the state has seen a decline in motor fuel tax revenues, fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic and the shift to electric and hybrid vehicles. These changes have left the state in need of new solutions to meet its growing transportation demands.
While the state has traditionally relied on motor fuel taxes, federal funds, and tolling, the financial landscape has shifted dramatically. According to a 2022 report by the Maryland Department of Transportation, the state faces a $2.3 billion revenue shortfall over the next decade, not to mention nearly $1.7 billion in immediate infrastructure repairs. This is compounded by the ongoing challenges faced by the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, which remains unfunded.
At the same time, construction costs have skyrocketed, with the National Highway Construction Cost Index showing a staggering 63% increase in costs since 2019. This leaves the state with no easy solutions, and the 2023 interim report by the Maryland Commission on Transportation Revenue and Infrastructure Needs (TRAIN) reveals the extent of the crisis. With the final report due in 2024, lawmakers are under pressure to find solutions that balance infrastructure needs with limited funds.
Rising Costs and Limited Funding: What’s the Plan?
One of the most pressing concerns for lawmakers is the ongoing funding shortfall. Despite efforts to address the issue, including the creation of TRAIN, the state is still far from finding a sustainable solution. The challenge is compounded by the rising cost of construction, making it even harder to tackle aging infrastructure, like the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse.
The lack of funding is a critical issue that affects not only the state but also local counties, which are responsible for maintaining 70% of the state’s roads and bridges. These counties rely almost entirely on state funding to cover the costs of maintenance and repairs. Given the financial constraints, the question is: How can Maryland address this massive shortfall without burdening taxpayers further?
Private Sector Investment: A Potential Solution
One of the more viable options to address the state’s infrastructure funding gap is to look beyond traditional government funding and consider private sector investment. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been successfully used in other states to fund and manage large-scale transportation projects, and Maryland should look to adopt this model.
During Governor Larry Hogan’s administration, the idea of a public-private partnership to replace the American Legion Bridge and add lanes to the Interstate 495 Capital Beltway gained traction. This model could bring significant benefits to Maryland. It allows private investors to shoulder a portion of the financial burden, while also ensuring that projects are completed more quickly and efficiently. These partnerships often involve a mix of tolls and private investment, which can be used to accelerate project delivery and improve overall project quality.
Here’s how it works: Private investors put up the capital to fund the construction and management of transportation projects, while tolls generated from the road or bridge are used to pay back the investment over time. This ensures that the public sector does not bear the entire burden of funding, while also incentivizing private companies to maintain and operate the facilities for the long term.
In return, the private sector gains a return on their investment, but it also benefits the state by improving traffic flow, reducing congestion, and stimulating local economies. The success of this model is not hypothetical—states like Virginia and Texas have implemented similar partnerships with positive results.
Why Public-Private Partnerships Make Sense
Public-private partnerships have several advantages that could greatly benefit Maryland. For one, they allow the state to tap into private capital that might otherwise be unavailable. Given the massive cost of infrastructure repairs and replacements, relying solely on public funds is simply not a sustainable solution.
Additionally, these partnerships can help reduce the political pressures that often slow down transportation projects. By involving private entities in the decision-making process, Maryland can avoid the political gridlock that typically accompanies large-scale infrastructure projects. This can lead to faster project completion and better outcomes for the public.
While tolls are often a point of contention, they can be more palatable when the revenue is used exclusively for maintaining and upgrading the infrastructure. However, trust in toll systems must be rebuilt, as past policies of diverting toll funds to unrelated projects have left constituents wary. With a solid public-private partnership model, Maryland can regain that trust while still addressing its critical infrastructure needs.
Expanding Public-Private Partnerships to Other Major Projects
While the American Legion Bridge project remains a central focus, there are other transportation projects across Maryland that could benefit from public-private partnerships. One of the most obvious is the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, which is facing increasing traffic congestion and aging infrastructure. Replacing or upgrading this vital link could be another opportunity for the private sector to get involved.
Other major bridge and road projects, like those along the Interstate 95 corridor, could also benefit from private investment. By leveraging the financial resources and expertise of private companies, the state can ensure that these projects are completed on time, within budget, and with minimal disruption to the public.
Key Benefits of Private Sector Involvement:
- Faster project delivery
- Reduced burden on taxpayers
- Increased investment in local economies
- Better maintenance and long-term sustainability
- More efficient use of public funds
The model has proven successful in several states, and Maryland would do well to adopt a similar approach.
Comments