Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy has reintroduced legislation that could make unpermitted public protests and actions like obstructing public spaces a felony offense. The move follows the failure of a similar bill last year, and critics worry about its impact on civil liberties.
In an unexpected yet bold move, Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy has once again set the stage for a legal showdown. The Governor reintroduced a bill on Monday that targets unpermitted protests, homelessness, and public space obstruction. Senate Bill 74 and House Bill 71 could impose felony charges on those found blocking or obstructing public areas.
This legislative proposal follows in the footsteps of a failed bill introduced last year. At the time, the idea of penalizing people for protesting or even blocking a sidewalk without a permit drew sharp criticism from civil liberties groups. Yet, this year’s reintroduction marks a critical moment for both protesters and public officials, as the bill seeks to reframe what it means to protest in Alaska.
Controversial Proposal
Both Senate Bill 74 and House Bill 71 aim to criminalize any activity that obstructs or blocks public spaces using a variety of means. This includes the use of substances or any other tactic that blocks movement in public areas like streets and sidewalks. Those found guilty could face a class C felony charge—the lowest level of felony under Alaskan law.
However, this bill isn’t solely focused on organized protests. It also targets issues related to homelessness. The Alaska Attorney General, Treg Taylor, stated last year that people who block sidewalks or trails—such as homeless individuals—could also be prosecuted under this law. While that remains part of the proposal, it’s stirred up fresh concerns regarding its potential to disproportionately affect vulnerable populations.
The bill’s reintroduction comes on the heels of protests last year against similar proposals, with critics warning that such legislation could stifle free speech and prevent protests from taking place. These new measures, if enacted, would mean that peaceful protestors and individuals without permits could face serious legal consequences, and the larger implications on the right to protest in Alaska are hard to ignore.
Governor’s Defense
Governor Dunleavy, however, has a very different take on the situation. He insists that the legislation is not about silencing dissent but about safeguarding the constitutional right to freedom of movement. In a statement released alongside Senate Bill 74, Dunleavy emphasized that the bill would protect the rights of Alaskans to “freely move about the state” without obstruction.
In his letter to the state Senate, the Governor pointed to an increased need for stronger penalties when it comes to blocking public places and rights-of-way. The law, according to Dunleavy, would reinforce existing criminal prohibitions and introduce civil liability to tackle obstructive actions.
It’s clear that the Governor intends to send a strong message: public space is meant for everyone, and no one person or group has the right to block that access. As cities across the U.S. face mounting tensions between protest movements and local authorities, Alaska appears to be stepping into the broader conversation about the limits of free protest.
A Lasting Debate
But there’s a deeper issue beneath this legislation. The conflict over balancing the rights of protestors and the need for public order isn’t a new one. Across the country, similar debates have unfolded, especially when protests evolve into actions that disrupt daily life. In some cases, protests have resulted in significant damage or inconvenience to others, raising the question of where to draw the line.
Yet, opponents of SB 74 and HB 71 argue that the Governor’s approach could set a dangerous precedent. Civil rights groups, like the ACLU, have long pushed back against laws they argue limit First Amendment rights. They say bills like this could lead to selective enforcement or disproportionately affect marginalized communities. In Alaska, where the homeless population is already struggling, critics worry that this bill could lead to more criminalization of poverty.
Still, the state legislature will have the final say. Both bills have been referred to the transportation committees in the Senate and House, but no hearings have been scheduled as of yet. As both sides of the debate gear up for more public discourse, this issue is poised to remain a central topic of conversation in Alaska’s political scene.
The path to a vote on these bills remains unclear, but one thing is for sure: the issue of public protest, its boundaries, and the role of law enforcement in regulating it, is far from resolved. And as Alaska inches closer to a decision on these bills, their outcome could set a tone for how protests are handled across the nation in the future.
Comments