Republican Rep. Justin Sparks from Wildwood is calling for a leadership change in Missouri’s state government, citing incoming House Speaker Jon Patterson’s stance on abortion. Sparks is challenging Patterson’s ability to defend anti-abortion values, setting the stage for a fierce political fight.
Sparks Takes Aim at Patterson Over Abortion Stance
Just days before the vote that would enshrine abortion rights in Missouri’s state constitution, Jon Patterson, the incoming House Speaker, made a remark that would come back to haunt him. At a candidate forum in late October, Patterson said that lawmakers should respect the voters’ decision, regardless of the outcome of Amendment 3. This comment didn’t sit well with many in his own party, including Rep. Justin Sparks, who now sees an opportunity to block Patterson’s appointment as speaker.
Sparks took to Facebook Live over the weekend to publicly challenge Patterson, saying, “On day one, your speaker must address and tackle Amendment 3.” Sparks, who has championed anti-abortion legislation during his time in office, believes that Patterson’s acceptance of the abortion amendment reflects a leadership style that does not align with the conservative values held by many Republicans in Missouri.
For Sparks, Patterson’s statement that the legislature should respect the outcome of the vote on abortion wasn’t a sign of unity, but of compromise. “That’s not what the leader of the Republican caucus should be saying, guys,” Sparks said in his video, making it clear that he believes Patterson is not the right person to defend the anti-abortion cause going forward.
Patterson’s Controversial Comments on Abortion
Jon Patterson has always been a conservative figure in Missouri politics, but his comments about abortion and his push for compromise have left some in the Republican party questioning his leadership. The amendment, which passed with 51.7% of the nearly 3 million votes cast in Missouri, will go into effect on December 5. It guarantees that abortion remains legal in the state until fetal viability, typically in the second trimester, and it expands protections for reproductive health care, including birth control, miscarriage care, and prenatal care.
Patterson, who currently serves as the House majority leader, had previously expressed opposition to Amendment 3. However, in the aftermath of its passage, he argued that the legislature should respect the will of the voters. “It will be the law of the land,” Patterson said, acknowledging that the issue of abortion had moved beyond legislative debates and was now a matter of state constitutional law.
But his remarks did not sit well with Sparks, who believes that the incoming speaker’s stance is too lenient and weak in defending Missouri’s anti-abortion position. Sparks has made it clear that he wants stronger leadership on the issue, with plans to pre-file a constitutional amendment to restrict abortion further in the next legislative session.
Sparks’ Fight for Anti-Abortion Leadership
Sparks’ challenge to Patterson isn’t just about opposing Patterson’s comments. The Wildwood Republican is on a mission to overhaul Missouri’s legislative landscape regarding abortion. He is determined to push for tighter restrictions, including a possible amendment that would reverse the protections enshrined by Amendment 3.
Sparks has introduced several anti-abortion bills in his tenure as a state lawmaker, including proposals that would prevent Missouri medical students from receiving abortion-specific training in other states and laws that would prohibit the use of fetal tissue from elective abortions for research purposes. Despite his efforts, these bills haven’t made much headway in the legislature. However, Sparks isn’t backing down. He’s convinced that further restrictions on abortion will be a major focus in the upcoming legislative session, and he wants to make sure the leadership is in place to champion these efforts.
“We need to define what we’re talking about when we address Amendment 3,” Sparks said. “And obviously, we need to go back to the voters so ultimately they can decide.” Sparks is pushing for a vote that would allow voters to impose even stricter abortion laws, reflecting his belief that the people of Missouri should have a say in the future of abortion access in the state.
The Power Struggle in Missouri’s GOP Leadership
The fight between Sparks and Patterson represents more than just a difference of opinion on abortion. It’s a struggle for power within Missouri’s Republican Party. The Speaker of the House is one of the most powerful positions in the legislature, responsible for setting the legislative agenda, assigning committee chairs, and overseeing debate. This position carries significant influence, especially as Missouri grapples with contentious issues like abortion and reproductive rights.
Sparks’ challenge comes as Patterson, who was selected by the Republican caucus last year to become the next speaker, prepares to take over the leadership role in January. But before that happens, Sparks is hoping to derail Patterson’s promotion. The Wildwood Republican is adamant that Patterson’s leadership is too focused on compromise and not focused enough on defending Missouri’s conservative values.
Sparks has even accused Patterson of blocking his own anti-abortion bills when Patterson was majority leader, a charge that has further fueled tensions between the two. “That’s not how you show leadership,” Sparks said, pointing to Patterson’s refusal to bring up his bills for debate.
A Deeply Divided GOP
Both Sparks and Patterson represent districts that voted in favor of Amendment 3, yet the two have different visions for how to proceed. Sparks represents St. Louis County, where over 67% of voters supported the abortion amendment. Patterson, on the other hand, represents Jackson County, which also backed the amendment but has a more conservative base overall. This division within the Republican Party in Missouri reflects broader tensions about how the GOP should handle the issue of abortion in the wake of Roe v. Wade’s overturning.
While Sparks’ challenge may seem like an uphill battle, he has garnered significant support from some corners of the GOP. His push for a more aggressive stance on abortion is in line with a growing movement among some conservative lawmakers across the country, who are increasingly determined to impose stricter abortion laws, despite public opinion shifting in favor of reproductive rights.
As Missouri prepares to grapple with the new abortion amendment in 2025, Sparks is making it clear that the fight is far from over. And if he has his way, a new speaker of the House will be leading the charge.
Comments