A former federal prosecutor is taking legal action against the Iowa Judicial Branch after allegedly being denied access to records linked to an ethics complaint he filed against fellow prosecutors. Robert Teig, a retired U.S. Attorney’s Office official, claims the state has failed to provide crucial documents under Iowa’s Open Records Law.
The Ethics Complaint and Denied Access
Robert Teig, who served as a federal prosecutor in Iowa for 32 years, filed an ethics complaint against three prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Iowa in 2023. The complaint stems from his concerns over how the prosecutors handled a criminal case where Teig had assisted the defendant’s attorney.
However, in February 2023, Teig’s complaint was dismissed by the Iowa Attorney Disciplinary Board, which claimed to have reviewed the complaint along with responses from other parties. Teig asserts that the board’s dismissal was flawed, as none of the alleged ethical issues were ever examined by a judge or even the Office of Professional Responsibility for the U.S. Department of Justice.
When Teig sought further details about the review process, he was denied access to the records, including the responses mentioned by the board. He was told that entities like the Attorney Disciplinary Board and the Iowa Office of Professional Regulation are not subject to the state’s Open Records Law, a claim that Teig challenges in his lawsuit.
Disputes Over Open Records Law
In his lawsuit, filed in Polk County District Court, Teig argues that the refusal to provide the records violates Iowa’s Open Records Law. According to Teig, even if the disciplinary entities aren’t officially classified as government agencies under the law, the documents they hold belong to the Iowa Judicial Branch. He also contends that state officials cannot avoid transparency by contracting out their functions to nongovernmental bodies.
Teig’s legal complaint highlights a critical point: If the Iowa Judicial Branch received or held the records, they should be available for public review. State officials, however, counter that certain records could be protected from disclosure due to exemptions in the Open Records Law. Specifically, they argue that communications with individuals outside the government, such as federal prosecutors, can remain confidential if disclosing them would discourage people from sharing information in the future.
Legal Action and Claims for Damages
Teig is not only seeking access to the requested records but also pursuing damages for the alleged violation of Iowa’s Open Records Law. His lawsuit includes a request for an injunction that would compel the Iowa Judicial Branch to release the records in question.
The state’s defense has yet to materialize. As of now, the defendants have not filed a response to the lawsuit. Representatives from both the Iowa Judicial Branch and the U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Iowa have declined to comment on the matter, citing ongoing legal proceedings.
Teig’s case brings into focus ongoing debates about transparency in government and the public’s right to access information. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a significant precedent regarding the handling of records tied to disciplinary matters within government agencies and the extent to which public access can be restricted.
Comments