In a heated debate held at Salt Lake Community College, Utah Governor Spencer Cox faced sharp criticism from both Democratic state Rep. Brian King and Libertarian candidate Robert Latham. The debate, organized by the Utah Debate Commission, covered a range of topics from former President Donald Trump to housing policy. Cox, who is seeking re-election, spent much of the evening defending his record against attacks from his opponents, who targeted his policies on energy, economic issues, and a controversial constitutional amendment.
Energy Policies Under Fire
Governor Cox’s support for coal and his signing of SB161, a bill extending the life of the coal-fired Intermountain Power Plant, was a major point of contention. Rep. Brian King argued that the state should follow the free market, which is increasingly favoring renewable energy sources. He criticized Cox for clinging to outdated energy policies that he believes are detrimental to the environment and the economy.
Robert Latham joined in the criticism, accusing Cox and the legislature of “crony capitalism” and giving undue advantages to lawmakers in coal-rich regions. Latham argued that the state’s energy policies are not only environmentally harmful but also economically unsustainable. He called for a shift towards more sustainable and market-driven energy solutions.
In response, Cox defended his decision, stating that Rocky Mountain Power needs to keep the coal plant operational because it cannot secure permits for a nuclear project in time. He warned that prematurely shutting down the coal plant would quadruple energy prices in Utah, a move he described as “insane.” Cox emphasized the need for a balanced approach to energy policy that ensures both sustainability and affordability.
Constitutional Amendment Controversy
Another significant issue discussed during the debate was the proposed Amendment D to the Utah Constitution. This amendment, which Cox signed a resolution to support, has been criticized for potentially weakening voters’ power to pass ballot initiatives. The amendment would clarify that the Legislature has the ultimate authority to change, repeal, or replace any ballot initiative passed in the state.
Rep. King labeled the amendment as a “power grab” and “deceptive,” urging Utahns to vote against it. He argued that the amendment would undermine the democratic process and diminish the power of the electorate. King emphasized the importance of preserving the integrity of ballot initiatives as a tool for direct democracy.
Latham echoed King’s sentiments, describing the language used by legislative leaders as “deceitful.” He argued that the amendment would erode public trust in the legislative process and concentrate too much power in the hands of lawmakers. Latham called for greater transparency and accountability in the legislative process to ensure that the will of the people is respected.
Governor Cox, however, deferred to the Legislature on this issue, stating that the governor does not have the authority to weigh in on constitutional amendments. He defended the amendment as a necessary clarification following a Utah Supreme Court ruling that limited the Legislature’s power to alter ballot initiatives. Cox argued that the amendment would provide much-needed clarity and stability to the legislative process.
Economic and Housing Policies
The debate also touched on economic and housing policies, with both King and Latham criticizing Cox’s approach. King argued that Cox’s economic policies have failed to address the growing income inequality and housing affordability crisis in Utah. He called for more robust measures to support low-income families and ensure access to affordable housing.
Latham took a libertarian stance, advocating for reduced government intervention in the housing market. He argued that excessive regulations and government interference have exacerbated the housing crisis. Latham called for a more market-driven approach to housing policy, emphasizing the need for deregulation and increased competition.
Cox defended his record, highlighting his administration’s efforts to boost economic growth and create jobs. He pointed to recent initiatives aimed at increasing affordable housing and supporting small businesses. Cox argued that his policies have helped to create a more vibrant and resilient economy, despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The debate highlighted the stark differences between the candidates on key issues, setting the stage for a contentious election season. As the campaign progresses, voters will have to weigh the competing visions for Utah’s future presented by Cox, King, and Latham.
Comments