As President-elect Donald Trump promises sweeping changes to U.S. immigration policy, birthright citizenship—granted by the 14th Amendment—becomes a flashpoint. The promise to end automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. is sparking debate, drawing attention to historical issues of identity, race, and the treatment of immigrants in America.
The Origins of Birthright Citizenship: A History of Who Gets to Be “American”
The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all people born or naturalized in the United States. This provision has historically been a cornerstone of American democracy, granting full citizenship to people born on U.S. soil, regardless of the status of their parents. But today, in light of Trump’s promises to end birthright citizenship, many are questioning whether this long-standing interpretation of the law is truly invincible.
But before diving into modern political debates, it’s worth understanding where the idea of citizenship in America originated. The birthright tradition was meant to ensure that children born on American soil would be full members of society—regardless of their background. It’s a reflection of America’s original purpose: a nation built on inclusivity, even as complicated as that might have been in practice throughout history.
Trump’s Promise and the Future of Birthright Citizenship
While Trump has repeatedly said he would end birthright citizenship through executive order, many legal scholars are skeptical. The 14th Amendment seems pretty clear. Still, given his track record of testing legal boundaries, it’s unclear whether he will succeed in his quest.
Some of Trump’s closest allies, including policy adviser Stephen Miller, have made no secret of their anti-immigrant stance. They argue that birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and makes it too easy for people to “game the system.” Their solution? Eliminate the practice altogether, thus denying U.S. citizenship to babies born to non-citizen parents.
- The argument is that babies born to non-citizens create an “anchor” that keeps families in the country.
- Critics argue that ending birthright citizenship would be unconstitutional and would deepen racial and ethnic divides in the country.
Despite the challenges in overturning the 14th Amendment, the administration’s push to restrict birthright citizenship underscores a broader issue of who gets to be considered truly “American.” The debate is not just legal, but cultural and political, and it taps into deep-seated fears about immigration.
Historical Precedents and the Myth of American Identity
The history of who gets to claim American citizenship has always been tangled with race, class, and power. The case of Napoleon Boone, one of the first children of white settlers born in Kansas in 1828, illustrates this point. Born on land that was originally inhabited by indigenous people, Boone’s birth was celebrated in the context of a newly expanding United States. Yet, it also highlights the complicated layers of American identity—where the children of settlers were considered “Americans” while indigenous people were not granted full citizenship until much later.
Similarly, the legend of Virginia Dare, born in 1587 in the lost colony of Roanoke, tells the story of a “first” American child. This colonial figure has been mythologized by both historians and white nationalists. However, these tales of “firsts” are often problematic, as they ignore the context of indigenous displacement and the subjugation of non-white populations.
The trend continues today, where groups such as white nationalists use the myth of American birthright to promote exclusionary policies. Their rhetoric often blurs the lines between who gets to be considered an “American” and who does not—raising the question: how does a country built by immigrants turn its back on future generations?
Key Moments in the Battle Over Birthright Citizenship:
- 1868: The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil.
- 1924: Native Americans gain U.S. citizenship, decades after white settlers.
- 1960s and 1970s: U.S. courts affirm that birthright citizenship applies to all children born in the U.S., regardless of their parents’ immigration status.
- 2010: Arizona passes a controversial immigration law, setting the stage for debates over the 14th Amendment.
- 2024: Trump’s election campaign brings birthright citizenship back into the national conversation.
The Future of Birthright Citizenship: A Divisive Issue
The discussion surrounding birthright citizenship is more than just a legal argument—it’s a deeply divisive political issue. Many on the right see the policy as a way to curb illegal immigration, while liberals view the practice as a crucial protection for children born in the country.
This division is evident in the varying state laws and local policies aimed at addressing immigration. Some states, like California, have passed sanctuary laws to protect immigrant families, while others, like Arizona, have made it clear that they’re willing to take a harder line. These differences highlight the uneven application of what it means to be an American—and the ever-present racial and political implications tied to it.
The broader question, however, remains: Should citizenship be a matter of birthplace or should it be determined by other criteria, like parental status, immigration status, or cultural assimilation?
Comments