The Trump administration’s aggressive push to slash federal spending has left a South Dakota Native American reservation without critical funding for a food initiative that could have provided fresh produce to thousands. The cuts, executed under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by billionaire Elon Musk, have abruptly canceled a $547,000 grant meant for planting fruit trees and berry bushes in backyards and community gardens.
A Major Blow to Food Security
The Sicangu Co., a nonprofit organization based on the Rosebud Sioux Reservation, had secured the grant through the Arbor Day Foundation, which distributed funds from an $8 million U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) program. The money was earmarked to support food sovereignty in tribal communities, where access to fresh produce remains scarce.
The project’s goal was straightforward: plant 70 fruit trees and 600 berry bushes across the reservation, with additional cultivation at the Keya Wakpala garden, an educational site attached to a Lakota immersion school. The produce from these gardens would have helped feed children at the school and supplied food boxes for tribal members.
Aaron Epps, a spokesperson for Sicangu Co., said the loss is devastating. The organization had just finalized a job description for a program facilitator when the email announcing the grant’s cancellation arrived. According to Epps, the long-term impact was undeniable—over the years, the planned plantings “would have fed thousands.”
The Broader Picture: DOGE’s Spending Cuts
The Sicangu grant’s loss is just one example of a larger, controversial push by the Trump administration to cut federal costs. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spearheaded by Musk, has been systematically terminating contracts, freezing funding, and laying off federal employees in an effort to trim government expenditures.
While many of the canceled programs involve billions in funding, the Sicangu grant’s cancellation underscores how smaller cuts can have disproportionate impacts on vulnerable communities. Todd County, home to the Rosebud Reservation, has faced persistent poverty for decades, with a poverty rate exceeding 20% for over 30 years, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
These cuts have also affected similar food programs in tribal communities nationwide, including the Bad River and Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in Wisconsin, the Catawba Nation in South Carolina, and the Native Village of Tyonek in Alaska.
What’s at Stake? The Reality of Food Deserts
Native American reservations are frequently classified as “food deserts,” meaning residents must travel long distances to find fresh produce. The USDA estimates that 2.3 million Americans live over a mile from a grocery store and lack access to a car. This creates significant challenges for maintaining a healthy diet, especially in rural and low-income areas.
Research has linked food deserts to higher rates of diet-related diseases, including diabetes and heart disease. For Indigenous communities, where health disparities are already pronounced, the impact can be severe. The USDA-funded grant aimed to address these gaps by supporting community-based agricultural projects that promote local food production.
A canceled grant doesn’t just mean fewer trees in the ground—it means fewer meals on tables and fewer opportunities for long-term sustainability.
Uncertain Future for Food Sovereignty Programs
Despite the setback, Sicangu Co. remains committed to its mission. The nonprofit still has funding to continue planting gardens in 60 backyards annually, but the broader vision of creating a sustainable, perennial food source is now on hold.
Epps said the organization is seeking alternative funding sources to keep the initiative alive. But given the scale of the federal cuts, replacing lost grants is proving difficult. Meanwhile, other tribes facing similar funding losses are scrambling to adjust their food security strategies.
For now, the Rosebud Sioux community and other affected tribes will have to find ways to move forward without the federal support they had planned for. The question remains: how many other small but critical programs will disappear in the name of government efficiency?
Comments